载入中
自定义HTML载入中... loading
丁学良:11.26武汉大学演讲小记——回答学生关于邹恒甫事件的提问-留美三博士 [原创 2007-11-28 11:00:25]   
字体变小 字体变大
标签: 丁学良 

I gave a public lecture on Nov. 26 in Wu-da, and about 500 students/ faculty attended. some asked the question of ZHF's relation with Bei-da GHS. I repeatedly stated that this is not a dog-fight thing and not a personal travial issue. it is about due process in a modern tertiary institution, ie., about how should a univ employ a scholar, what terms and conditions it needs to offer in return for his/ her professional service, and what it can or can not do in its work relation with that scholar. and all this must be stipulated clearly on paper and go through a pre-specified process if there is a dispute between thetwo parties.i think the students got these important points. and i believe what i said of
the event is a fair public comment.

(学良按:笔者平时已经习惯用英文写作,这与爱国主义无关,仅是个人习惯。大家读来就当作练习英语亦可,不识英文可看下面叶楚华的译文)

译文:

11月26日我在武大作了一个公开演讲,约500名学生/教师
出席。有人提问涉及邹恒甫与北大光华的关系问题。
 
我一再声明,这不是一个狗咬狗的事情,不是个人的私事。它关乎现代高等教育院校的程序正当与否的一系列问题,即:大学如何聘请一位学者;以什么条款及条件回报他/她(受聘者)提供的专业服务;及校方在与受聘学者的劳动关系中哪些是可以做的、哪些是不可以做的。而这一切,必须在文本协议中明确规定,并且一旦双方发生争执,双方必须根据预先议定的程序来解决争议。
 
我觉得听我演讲的学生们当天都能领会我上面所述的要点,同时我相信我对这个事件发表的是一个公平公开的评论。

 


票数:
什么是“我顶”?
点击数:    评论数:
本文章引用通告地址(TrackBack Ping URL)为:
本文章尚未被引用。
发表评论
大 名:
(不填写则显示为匿名者)
网 址:
(您的网址,可以不填)
标 题:
内 容:
请根据下图中的字符输入验证码:
(您的评论将有可能审核后才能发表)
和讯个人门户 v1.0 | 和讯部落 | 客服中心